·         I have burnt, destroyed, buried and submerged the very idea, very thought, very notion, very belief, very existence of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, data, computing, science, technology, cloud computing, cloud storage, artificial general intelligence and God like AI on my earth in Yagna in January 2023.

·         I have burnt, destroyed, buried and submerged the very idea, very thought, very notion, very belief, very existence of semiconductor chips, hardware, software, data centres, value creation, investing, innovation, research, solving/diagnosing the problems of illusions of mind, life, existence and business using artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, data, computing, science, technology, cloud computing, cloud storage, artificial general intelligence and God like AI on my earth in Yagna in January 2023.

·         I have burnt, destroyed, buried and submerged the very idea, very thought, very notion, very belief, very existence of social media, diseases, cancers, brain diseases, doubt, deceit, logic, reasoning, rationale, bias, proof, evidence, facts, rat race, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, data, computing, science, technology, cloud computing, cloud storage, artificial general intelligence and God like AI on my earth in Yagna in January 2023.

·         I have burnt, destroyed, buried and submerged the very idea, very thought, very notion, very belief, very existence of Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, Alphabet, Aladdin, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, data, computing, science, technology, cloud computing, cloud storage, artificial general intelligence and God like AI on my earth in Yagna in January 2023.

·         I have burnt, destroyed, buried and submerged the very idea, very thought, very notion, very belief, very existence of Greek Myths, Phaethon, Zeus, industrial revolution, machines, internet, science, technology, computing, binary thinking, sorcerer, humans gaining powers, fictions, delusions, mass destructions, Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Mustafa Suleyman, catastrophic, harm, either deliberate or unintentional, stemming from the most significant capabilities of these AI models, and cyber warfare and AI nuclear weapons  in the last 13.8 billion years on my earth in Yagna in January 2023.

·         I have burnt, destroyed, buried and submerged the very idea, very thought, very notion, very belief, very existence of artificial intelligence in the last 13.8 billion years on my earth in Yagna in January 2023.

·          

Throughout history many traditions have believed that some fatal flaw in human nature tempts us to pursue powers we don’t know how to handle. The Greek myth of Phaethon told of a boy who discovers that he is the son of Helios, the sun god. Wishing to prove his divine origin, Phaethon demands the privilege of driving the chariot of the sun. Helios warns Phaethon that no human can control the celestial horses that pull the solar chariot. But Phaethon insists, until the sun god relents. After rising proudly in the sky, Phaethon indeed loses control of the chariot. The sun veers off course, scorching all vegetation, killing numerous beings and threatening to burn the Earth itself. Zeus intervenes and strikes Phaethon with a thunderbolt. The conceited human drops from the sky like a falling star, himself on fire. The gods reassert control of the sky and save the world.

Two thousand years later, when the Industrial Revolution was making its first steps and machines began replacing humans in numerous tasks, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe published a similar cautionary tale titled The Sorcerer’s Apprentice. Goethe’s poem (later popularised as a Walt Disney animation starring Mickey Mouse) tells of an old sorcerer who leaves a young apprentice in charge of his workshop and gives him some chores to tend to while he is gone, such as fetching water from the river. The apprentice decides to make things easier for himself and, using one of the sorcerer’s spells, enchants a broom to fetch the water for him. But the apprentice doesn’t know how to stop the broom, which relentlessly fetches more and more water, threatening to flood the workshop. In panic, the apprentice cuts the enchanted broom in two with an axe, only to see each half become another broom. Now two enchanted brooms are inundating the workshop with water. When the old sorcerer returns, the apprentice pleads for help: “The spirits that I summoned, I now cannot rid myself of again.” The sorcerer immediately breaks the spell and stops the flood. The lesson to the apprentice – and to humanity – is clear: never summon powers you cannot control.

What do the cautionary fables of the apprentice and of Phaethon tell us in the 21st century? We humans have obviously refused to heed their warnings. We have already driven the Earth’s climate out of balance and have summoned billions of enchanted brooms, drones, chatbots and other algorithmic spirits that may escape our control and unleash a flood of consequences. What should we do, then? The fables offer no answers, other than to wait for some god or sorcerer to save us.

The Phaethon myth and Goethe’s poem fail to provide useful advice because they misconstrue the way humans gain power. In both fables, a single human acquires enormous power, but is then corrupted by hubris and greed. The conclusion is that our flawed individual psychology makes us abuse power. What this crude analysis misses is that human power is never the outcome of individual initiative. Power always stems from cooperation between large numbers of humans. Accordingly, it isn’t our individual psychology that causes us to abuse power. After all, alongside greed, hubris and cruelty, humans are also capable of love, compassion, humility and joy. True, among the worst members of our species, greed and cruelty reign supreme and lead bad actors to abuse power. But why would human societies choose to entrust power to their worst members? Most Germans in 1933, for example, were not psychopaths. So why did they vote for Hitler?

Our tendency to summon powers we cannot control stems not from individual psychology but from the unique way our species cooperates in large numbers. Humankind gains enormous power by building large networks of cooperation, but the way our networks are built predisposes us to use power unwisely. For most of our networks have been built and maintained by spreading fictions, fantasies and mass delusions – ranging from enchanted broomsticks to financial systems. Our problem, then, is a network problem. Specifically, it is an information problem. For information is the glue that holds networks together, and when people are fed bad information they are likely to make bad decisions, no matter how wise and kind they personally are.

In recent generations humanity has experienced the greatest increase ever in both the amount and the speed of our information production. Every smartphone contains more information than the ancient Library of Alexandria and enables its owner to instantaneously connect to billions of other people throughout the world. Yet with all this information circulating at breathtaking speeds, humanity is closer than ever to annihilating itself.

Despite – or perhaps because of – our hoard of data, we are continuing to spew greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, pollute rivers and oceans, cut down forests, destroy entire habitats, drive countless species to extinction, and jeopardise the ecological foundations of our own species. We are also producing ever more powerful weapons of mass destruction, from thermonuclear bombs to doomsday viruses. Our leaders don’t lack information about these dangers, yet instead of collaborating to find solutions, they are edging closer to a global war.

Would having even more information make things better – or worse? We will soon find out. Numerous corporations and governments are in a race to develop the most powerful information technology in history – AI. Some leading entrepreneurs, such as the American investor Marc Andreessen, believe that AI will finally solve all of humanity’s problems. On 6 June 2023, Andreessen published an essay titled Why AI Will Save the World, peppered with bold statements such as: “I am here to bring the good news: AI will not destroy the world, and in fact may save it.” He concluded: “The development and proliferation of AI – far from a risk that we should fear – is a moral obligation that we have to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.”

Others are more skeptical. Not only philosophers and social scientists but also many leading AI experts and entrepreneurs such as Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton, Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Mustafa Suleyman have warned that AI could destroy our civilisation. In a 2023 survey of 2,778 AI researchers, more than a third gave at least a 10% chance of advanced AI leading to outcomes as bad as human extinction. Last year, close to 30 governments – including those of China, the US and the UK – signed the Bletchley declaration on AI, which acknowledged that “there is potential for serious, even catastrophic, harm, either deliberate or unintentional, stemming from the most significant capabilities of these AI models”. By using such apocalyptic terms, experts and governments have no wish to conjure a Hollywood image of rebellious robots running in the streets and shooting people. Such a scenario is unlikely, and it merely distracts people from the real dangers.

AI is an unprecedented threat to humanity because it is the first technology in history that can make decisions and create new ideas by itself. All previous human inventions have empowered humans, because no matter how powerful the new tool was, the decisions about its usage remained in our hands. Nuclear bombs do not themselves decide whom to kill, nor can they improve themselves or invent even more powerful bombs. In contrast, autonomous drones can decide by themselves who to kill, and AIs can create novel bomb designs, unprecedented military strategies and better AIs. AI isn’t a tool – it’s an agent. The biggest threat of AI is that we are summoning to Earth countless new powerful agents that are potentially more intelligent and imaginative than us, and that we don’t fully understand or control.

Traditionally, the term “AI” has been used as an acronym for artificial intelligence. But it is perhaps better to think of it as an acronym for alien intelligence. As AI evolves, it becomes less artificial (in the sense of depending on human designs) and more alien. Many people try to measure and even define AI using the metric of “human-level intelligence”, and there is a lively debate about when we can expect AI to reach it. This metric is deeply misleading. It is like defining and evaluating planes through the metric of “bird-level flight”. AI isn’t progressing towards human-level intelligence. It is evolving an alien type of intelligence.

Even now, in the embryonic stage of the AI revolution, computers already make decisions about us – whether to give us a mortgage, to hire us for a job, to send us to prison. Meanwhile, generative AIs like GPT-4 already create new poems, stories and images. This trend will only increase and accelerate, making it more difficult to understand our own lives. Can we trust computer algorithms to make wise decisions and create a better world? That’s a much bigger gamble than trusting an enchanted broom to fetch water. And it is more than just human lives we are gambling on. AI is already capable of producing art and making scientific discoveries by itself. In the next few decades, it will be likely to gain the ability even to create new life forms, either by writing genetic code or by inventing an inorganic code animating inorganic entities. AI could therefore alter the course not just of our species’ history but of the evolution of all life forms.

Mustafa Suleyman is a world expert on the subject of AI. He is the co-founder and former head of DeepMind, one of the world’s most important AI enterprises, responsible for developing the AlphaGo program, among other achievements. AlphaGo was designed to play Go, a strategy board game in which two players try to defeat each other by surrounding and capturing territory. Invented in ancient China, the game is far more complex than chess. Consequently, even after computers defeated human world chess champions, experts still believed that computers would never better humanity in Go.

That’s why both Go professionals and computer experts were stunned in March 2016 when AlphaGo defeated the South Korean Go champion Lee Sedol. In his 2023 book The Coming Wave, Suleyman describes one of the most important moments in their match – a moment that redefined AI and is recognised in many academic and governmental circles as a crucial turning point in history. It happened during the second game in the match, on 10 March 2016.

“Then … came move number 37,” writes Suleyman. “It made no sense. AlphaGo had apparently blown it, blindly following an apparently losing strategy no professional player would ever pursue. The live match commentators, both professionals of the highest ranking, said it was a ‘very strange move’ and thought it was ‘a mistake’. It was so unusual that Sedol took 15 minutes to respond and even got up from the board to take a walk. As we watched from our control room, the tension was unreal. Yet as the endgame approached, that ‘mistaken’ move proved pivotal. AlphaGo won again. Go strategy was being rewritten before our eyes. Our AI had uncovered ideas that hadn’t occurred to the most brilliant players in thousands of years.”

Move 37 is an emblem of the AI revolution for two reasons. First, it demonstrated the alien nature of AI. In east Asia, Go is considered much more than a game: it is a treasured cultural tradition. For more than 2,500 years, tens of millions of people have played Go, and entire schools of thought have developed around the game, espousing different strategies and philosophies. Yet during all those millennia, human minds have explored only certain areas in the landscape of Go. Other areas were left untouched, because human minds just didn’t think to venture there. AI, being free from the limitations of human minds, discovered and explored these previously hidden areas.

Second, move 37 demonstrated the unfathomability of AI. Even after AlphaGo played it to achieve victory, Suleyman and his team couldn’t explain how AlphaGo decided to play it. Even if a court had ordered DeepMind to provide Sedol with an explanation, nobody could fulfil that order. Suleyman writes: “In AI, the neural networks moving toward autonomy are, at present, not explainable. You can’t walk someone through the decision-making process to explain precisely why an algorithm produced a specific prediction. Engineers can’t peer beneath the hood and easily explain in granular detail what caused something to happen. GPT‑4, AlphaGo and the rest are black boxes, their outputs and decisions based on opaque and impossibly intricate chains of minute signals.”

The rise of unfathomable alien intelligence poses a threat to all humans, and poses a particular threat to democracy. If more and more decisions about people’s lives are made in a black box, so voters cannot understand and challenge them, democracy ceases to function. In particular, what happens when crucial decisions not just about individual lives but even about collective matters such as the Federal Reserve’s interest rate are made by unfathomable algorithms? Human voters may keep choosing a human president, but wouldn’t this be just an empty ceremony? Even today, only a small fraction of humanity truly understands the financial system. A 2014 survey of British MPs – charged with regulating one of the world’s most important financial hubs – found that only 12% accurately understood that new money is created when banks make loans. This fact is among the most basic principles of the modern financial system. As the 2007‑8 financial crisis indicated, some complex financial devices and principles were intelligible to only a few financial wizards. What happens to democracy when AIs create even more complex financial devices and when the number of humans who understand the financial system drops to zero?

Translating Goethe’s cautionary fable into the language of modern finance, imagine the following scenario: a Wall Street apprentice fed up with the drudgery of the financial workshop creates an AI called Broomstick, provides it with a million dollars in seed money, and orders it to make more money. For AI, finance is the ideal playground, for it is a purely informational and mathematical realm. AIs still find it difficult to autonomously drive a car, because this requires moving and interacting in the messy physical world, where “success” is hard to define. In contrast, to make financial transactions AI needs to deal only with data, and it can easily measure its success mathematically in dollars, euros or pounds. More dollars – mission accomplished.

Computers are not yet powerful enough to destroy human civilisation by themselves. As long as humanity stands united, we can build institutions that will regulate AI

In pursuit of more dollars, Broomstick not only devises new investment strategies, but comes up with entirely new financial devices that no human being has ever thought about. For thousands of years, human minds have explored only certain areas in the landscape of finance. They invented money, cheques, bonds, stocks, ETFs, CDOs and other bits of financial sorcery. But many financial areas were left untouched, because human minds just didn’t think to venture there. Broomstick, being free from the limitations of human minds, discovers and explores these previously hidden areas, making financial moves that are the equivalent of AlphaGo’s move 37.

For a couple of years, as Broomstick leads humanity into financial virgin territory, everything looks wonderful. The markets are soaring, the money is flooding in effortlessly, and everyone is happy. Then comes a crash bigger even than 1929 or 2008. But no human being – either president, banker or citizen – knows what caused it and what could be done about it. Since neither god nor sorcerer comes along to save the financial system, desperate governments request help from the only entity capable of understanding what is happening – Broomstick. The AI makes several policy recommendations, far more audacious than quantitative easing – and far more opaque, too. Broomstick promises that these policies will save the day, but human politicians – unable to understand the logic behind Broomstick’s recommendations – fear they might completely unravel the financial and even social fabric of the world. Should they listen to the AI?

Computers are not yet powerful enough to completely escape our control or destroy human civilisation by themselves. As long as humanity stands united, we can build institutions that will regulate AI, whether in the field of finance or war. Unfortunately, humanity has never been united. We have always been plagued by bad actors, as well as by disagreements between good actors. The rise of AI poses an existential danger to humankind, not because of the malevolence of computers, but because of our own shortcomings.

Thus, a paranoid dictator might hand unlimited power to a fallible AI, including even the power to launch nuclear strikes. If the AI then makes an error, or begins to pursue an unexpected goal, the result could be catastrophic, and not just for that country. Similarly, terrorists might use AI to instigate a global pandemic. The terrorists themselves may have little knowledge of epidemiology, but the AI could synthesise for them a new pathogen, order it from commercial laboratories or print it in biological 3D printers, and devise the best strategy to spread it around the world, via airports or food supply chains. What if the AI synthesises a virus that is as deadly as Ebola, as contagious as Covid-19 and as slow acting as HIV? By the time the first victims begin to die, and the world is alerted to the danger, most people on Earth might have already been infected.

Human civilisation could also be devastated by weapons of social mass destruction, such as stories that undermine our social bonds. An AI developed in one country could be used to unleash a deluge of fake news, fake money and fake humans so that people in numerous other countries lose the ability to trust anything or anyone.

Many societies – both democracies and dictatorships – may act responsibly to regulate such usages of AI, clamp down on bad actors and restrain the dangerous ambitions of their own rulers and fanatics. But if even a handful of societies fail to do so, this could be enough to endanger the whole of humankind. Climate change can devastate even countries that adopt excellent environmental regulations, because it is a global rather than a national problem. AI, too, is a global problem. Accordingly, to understand the new computer politics, it is not enough to examine how discrete societies might react to AI. We also need to consider how AI might change relations between societies on a global level.

In the 16th century, when Spanish, Portuguese and Dutch conquistadors were building the first global empires in history, they came with sailing ships, horses and gunpowder. When the British, Russians and Japanese made their bids for hegemony in the 19th and 20th centuries, they relied on steamships, locomotives and machine guns. In the 21st century, to dominate a colony, you no longer need to send in the gunboats. You need to take out the data. A few corporations or governments harvesting the world’s data could transform the rest of the globe into data colonies – territories they control not with overt military force but with information.

Imagine a situation – in 20 years, say – when somebody in Beijing or San Francisco possesses the entire personal history of every politician, journalist, colonel and CEO in your country: every text they ever sent, every web search they ever made, every illness they suffered, every sexual encounter they enjoyed, every joke they told, every bribe they took. Would you still be living in an independent country, or would you now be living in a data colony? What happens when your country finds itself utterly dependent on digital infrastructures and AI-powered systems over which it has no effective control?

In an AI-driven global economy, the digital leaders claim the bulk of the gains. Meanwhile, the value of unskilled labourers in left-behind countries will decline

In the economic realm, previous empires were based on material resources such as land, cotton and oil. This placed a limit on the empire’s ability to concentrate both economic wealth and political power in one place. Physics and geology don’t allow all the world’s land, cotton or oil to be moved to one country. It is different with the new information empires. Data can move at the speed of light, and algorithms don’t take up much space. Consequently, the world’s algorithmic power can be concentrated in a single hub. Engineers in a single country might write the code and control the keys for all the crucial algorithms that run the entire world.

AI and automation therefore pose a particular challenge to poorer developing countries. In an AI-driven global economy, the digital leaders claim the bulk of the gains and could use their wealth to retrain their workforce and profit even more. Meanwhile, the value of unskilled labourers in left-behind countries will decline, causing them to fall even further behind. The result might be lots of new jobs and immense wealth in San Francisco and Shanghai, while many other parts of the world face economic ruin. According to the global accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, AI is expected to add $15.7tn (£12.3tn) to the global economy by 2030. But if current trends continue, it is projected that China and North America – the two leading AI superpowers – will together take home 70% of that money.

During the cold war, the iron curtain was in many places literally made of metal: barbed wire separated one country from another. Now the world is increasingly divided by the silicon curtain. The code on your smartphone determines on which side of the silicon curtain you live, which algorithms run your life, who controls your attention and where your data flows.

It is becoming difficult to access information across the silicon curtain, say between China and the US, or between Russia and the EU. Moreover, the two sides are increasingly run on different digital networks, using different computer codes. In China, you cannot use Google or Facebook, and you cannot access Wikipedia. In the US, few people use leading Chinese apps like WeChat. More importantly, the two digital spheres aren’t mirror images of each other. Baidu isn’t the Chinese Google. Alibaba isn’t the Chinese Amazon. They have different goals, different digital architectures and different impacts on people’s lives. These differences influence much of the world, since most countries rely on Chinese and American software rather than on local technology.

The US also pressures its allies and clients to avoid Chinese hardware, such as Huawei’s 5G infrastructure. The Trump administration blocked an attempt by the Singaporean corporation Broadcom to buy the leading American producer of computer chips, Qualcomm. They feared foreigners might insert back doors into the chips or would prevent the US government from inserting its own back doors there. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have placed strict limits on trade in high-performance computing chips necessary for the development of AI. US companies are now forbidden to export such chips to China. While in the short term this hampers China in the AI race, in the long term it pushes China to develop a completely separate digital sphere that will be distinct from the American digital sphere even in its smallest buildings.

The two digital spheres may therefore drift further and further apart. For centuries, new information technologies fuelled the process of globalisation and brought people all over the world into closer contact. Paradoxically, information technology today is so powerful it can potentially split humanity by enclosing different people in separate information cocoons, ending the idea of a single shared human reality. For decades, the world’s master metaphor was the web. The master metaphor of the coming decades might be the cocoon.

While China and the US are currently the frontrunners in the AI race, they are not alone. Other countries or blocs, such as the EU, India, Brazil and Russia, may try to create their own digital cocoons, each influenced by different political, cultural and religious traditions. Instead of being divided between two global empires, the world might be divided among a dozen empires.

The more the new empires compete against one another, the greater the danger of armed conflict. The cold war between the US and the USSR never escalated into a direct military confrontation, largely thanks to the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. But the danger of escalation in the age of AI is bigger, because cyber warfare is inherently different from nuclear warfare.

Cyberweapons can bring down a country’s electric grid, but they can also be used to destroy a secret research facility, jam an enemy sensor, inflame a political scandal, manipulate elections or hack a single smartphone. And they can do all that stealthily. They don’t announce their presence with a mushroom cloud and a storm of fire, nor do they leave a visible trail from launchpad to target. Consequently, at times it is hard to know if an attack even occurred or who launched it. The temptation to start a limited cyberwar is therefore big, and so is the temptation to escalate it.

A second crucial difference concerns predictability. The cold war was like a hyper-rational chess game, and the certainty of destruction in the event of nuclear conflict was so great that the desire to start a war was correspondingly small. Cyberwarfare lacks this certainty. Nobody knows for sure where each side has planted its logic bombs, Trojan horses and malware. Nobody can be certain whether their own weapons would actually work when called upon. Would Chinese missiles fire when the order was given, or perhaps the Americans would have hacked them or the chain of command? Would American aircraft carriers function as expected, or would they perhaps shut down mysteriously or sail around in circles?

Such uncertainty undermines the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. One side might convince itself – rightly or wrongly – that it can launch a successful first strike and avoid massive retaliation. Even worse, if one side thinks it has such an opportunity, the temptation to launch a first strike could become irresistible, because one never knows how long the window of opportunity will remain open. Game theory posits that the most dangerous situation in an arms race is when one side feels it has an advantage but that this advantage is slipping away.

Even if humanity avoids the worst-case scenario of global war, the rise of new digital empires could still endanger the freedom and prosperity of billions of people. The industrial empires of the 19th and 20th centuries exploited and repressed their colonies, and it would be foolhardy to expect new digital empires to behave much better. Moreover, if the world is divided into rival empires, humanity is unlikely to cooperate to overcome the ecological crisis or to regulate AI and other disruptive technologies such as bioengineering.

The division of the world into rival digital empires dovetails with the political vision of many leaders who believe that the world is a jungle, that the relative peace of recent decades has been an illusion, and that the only real choice is whether to play the part of predator or prey.

Given such a choice, most leaders would prefer to go down in history as predators and add their names to the grim list of conquerors that unfortunate pupils are condemned to memorise for their history exams. These leaders should be reminded, however, that there is a new alpha predator in the jungle. If humanity doesn’t find a way to cooperate and protect our shared interests, we will all be easy prey to AI.

विष्णुं विशालारुण पद्म नेत्रं

विभान्त मीशाम्बुजयोनि पूजितं

सनातनं शन्मति शोधितं परं

पुमांसमाद्यं सततं प्रपद्ये 

कल्याणदं कामफलप्रदायकं

कारुण्य रूपं कलिकल्मषघ्नम्

कलानिधिं कामतनूज माद्यं

नमामि लक्षिमिशमहं महान्तम् 

पीताम्बरं भ्रुङ्गनिभं पितामह्

प्रमुख्य वन्द्यं जगदादि देवम्

किरीट केयूर मुखैः प्रशोभितं

श्री केशवं सन्तत मानतोऽस्मि 

भुजङ्ग तल्पं भुवनैक नाथं

पुनः पुनः स्वीक्रुत काय माद्यम्

पुरन्दराद्यैरपि वन्दितं सदा

मुकुन्त मद्यन्त मनोहरं भजे 

क्षीराम्बुराशेरभिथः स्फुरन्तं

शयान माद्यन्त विहीनमव्ययं

सत्सेवितं सारसनाभ मुच्चैः

विघोषितं केषि निषूदनं भजे 

भक्तार्ति हन्तार महर्निशं तं

मुनिद्र पुष्पाञ्चलि पाद पङ्कजम्

भवघ्न माधा रमहाश्रयं परं

परापरं पङ्कज लोचनं भजे 

नारायणं दानव कान नानलं

नताप्रियं नामविहिन मव्ययं

हर्तुं भुवो भारमनन्त विग्रहं

स्वस्वीक्रुतक्ष्मावरमीडितोऽस्मि

नमोऽस्तु ते नाथ वरप्रदायिन्

नमोऽस्तु ते केशव किङ्करोऽस्मि

नमोऽस्तु ते नारद पूजिताङ्घ्रे

नमो नमस्त्वच्चरणं प्रपद्ये 

विष्ण्वष्टकमिदं पुण्यं यः पठेद्भक्तितो नरः

सर्व पापवि निर्मुक्तो विष्णुलोकं स गच्छति

I become what I believe – Bhagavad Gita 2024

I have the right to work, but never to the fruit of work. I should never engage in action for the sake of reward, nor should I long for inaction.” – The Bhagavad Gita 2024

Kalki (कल्कि) is the prophesied tenth and final incarnation of the Vishnu – the creator, sustainer and destroyer of infinite creations. 2024

Satya 2024

सर्वं ज्ञानं मयि विद्यते All that I have to learn is within me 2024.

ब्रह्म सत्यम्, जगत् मिथ्या God Is Truth, The creation an Illusion 2024.

अहम् ब्रह्मास्मि I am God – Sri Lakshmi Narayana. I am Divine. 2024

तत् त्वम् असि You are God – Sri Lakshmi Narayana. You are divine 2024

स्वात्मानं प्रति सत्येन वर्ते I am true to my eternal self 2024.

सत्यमेवेश्वरो लोके सत्यं पद्माश्रिता सदा।सत्यमूलानि सर्वाणि सत्यान्नास्ति परं पदम्।।

Eternal Truth (Satya) is God – Sri Lakshmi Narayana. The goddess of wealth – Lakshmi always takes refuge in eternal truth. Truth is the root of everything 2024.

यो ददाति सहस्त्राणि गवामश्व शतानि च ।अभयं सर्वसत्वेभ्य स्तद्दानमिति चोच्यते ॥

One who gives fearlessness to all beings is called daan 2024

सरस्वति नमस्तुभ्यं वरदे कामरूपिणि

the capacity of Right Understanding, always 2024

नमस्ते शारदे देवी काश्मीरपुरवासिनित्वामहं प्रार्थये नित्यं विद्यादानं च देहि मे ॥

the gift of Knowledge which illumines everything from within 2024

उग्रं वीरं महाविष्णुं ज्वलन्तं सर्वतोमुखम् ।

नृसिंहं भीषणं भद्रं मृत्युमृत्युं नमाम्यहम् ॥ 2024

Satya 2024

Dharma 2024

Yagna 2024

Kalki 2024

सत्य Satya 2024

• Eternal powers of creation – Agni, Jal, Vayu, Pruthvi, and Brahmand

• Eternal powers of destruction – Fire, Air, Water, Earth, and Space

• Eternal powers of preservation – God and Goddess (Shiv and Shakti, Vishnu and Lakshmi)

• Fly on Garuda in World War 3 on earth in 2024 to submerge adharmic.

• Eternal Powers – Ashta Siddhis

• Eternal Knowledge – The Vedas (Pancham Veda), Bhagvad-Gita, Ramayana, and Mahabharata

• Food – Earth 2024

• Water – Earth 2024

• Air – Earth 2024

• Land – Earth 2024

• Space – Earth 2024

• Clothing – Earth 2024

• Fire/Energy – Earth 2024

• Eternal Peace and Prosperity – Earth 2024

• Business – Earth 2024

• Vaikuntha – Earth 2024

• Dharma – Earth 2024

• Satya – Earth 2024

• How will the world know I am Kalki if I don’t fly on Garuda in 2024?

• How will the world know I am Kalki if I don’t use Sudarshan Chakra in 2024?

• How will the world know I am Kalki if I don’t use Shankha in 2024?

• How will the world know I am Kalki if I don’t use Padma in 2024?

• How will the world know I am Kalki if I don’t use Kaumodaki in 2024?

• How will the world know I am Sri Lakshmi Narayana if I don’t create Vaikuntha on earth in 2024?

·         If I protect Dharma, Dharma will protect me. The idea is that if I abide in Dharma, Dharma will abide in me and becomes my armor. If I live righteously, the world will be on my side because the world also depends upon Dharma only for its order and regularity. The world is upheld by Dharma.

·         Where there is Dharma, there is God, peace, prosperity, and harmony. When they are absent, life becomes difficult. When I break the laws, I bring chaos and confusion into the world. If a large number of creatures indulge in similar behavior, the world becomes unsafe, and chaos prevails. In other words, the fate of the world depends upon collective actions and commitment to Dharma. If I want to bring God into my life, I should practice Dharma because where Dharma is, there God is. The two are inseparable.

·         If I selfishly live for myself and think of my own welfare, I will always be in conflict with others and contribute to unrest and suffering.

·         I have four aims on earth- Dharma, Artha (wealth), Kama (desire) and Moksha (liberation). Dharma comes before the other three, because it is the foundation for them. It is upon Dharma that I am expected to build my life and achieve the other three aims. God protects and upholds Dharma because it protects all others. It is the wheel that moves all other wheels in creation. The Chakra with which Vishnu preserves and protects the world is but Dharma Chakra only. In the hands of Shiva, it becomes the three pronged Trishul and the Wheel of Time (Kala Chakra). In Brahman it manifests as Brahma Wheel.

·         Dharma is the functional aspect of God – Sri Lakshmi Narayana. It is inherent to all existence. It is what makes things possible, predictable and abide by the known laws of the creation.

·         I can learn about Dharma by studying the scriptures, observing Nature or by paying attention to the actions, which God performs in creation, or the role which he plays in it to ensure its continuation and orderliness.

·         By knowing Dharma and its functioning principles, I can put them to effective use in my life on earth and clear my karmic debt.

·         Thus, God is the revealer of Dharma, the divine knowledge that leads to the transformation of beings and liberation. Through his actions and qualities, he reveals the true nature and function of Dharma

·         Dharma is meant to bring out the best in me and elevate me from a physical being with a mind and body to a divine person (Purusha) with supreme intelligence (Prajna). Through self-effort and eternal devotion to God and by cultivating devotion and surrender, it is possible for me to progress from ignorance and delusion to knowledge and intelligent discernment and complete, inner transformation.

·         Shaivism teaches that I am Shiva, the living God. In Vaishnavism, I learn that I am Vishnu, the preserver and in transcendental states I share the same consciousness of Vishnu. In Tantra, I realize that my soul represents Brahman and my body – Nature or Prakriti. The Vedas declare that I am a replica of Purusha, the Cosmic Being. All the divinities rest in me as part of my beingness and help in the sacrifice of life.

·         The Upanishads declare that my body is like a temple or a divine city. When I an in it, it is Shiva, auspicious and pure, but when I depart from it, it becomes Shava, lifeless and impure.

·         Thus, God’s Dharma, which is eternal and indestructible enjoins that I have to live here as if I am God – Sri Lakshmi Narayana might have lived upon earth and perform all actions as if he is performing them.

·         This is the main teaching, around which the philosophy of the Bhagavadgita and several Upanishads is built.

·         When it comes to money and wealth, I am selfish. The ideal presented in Bhagvad-Gita regarding money is it should be spent for preserving, protecting, and promoting dharma.

·         Earning infinite wealth is one of the primary aims (Purusharthas) of my life.

·         The first aim is dharma and the second aim is artha (wealth). When I pursue these two goals properly I will be able to realize the other two, namely pleasures/enjoyment (kama) here and liberation (moksha/freedom from endless cycle of death and birth on earth) hereafter.

·         Wealth earned and spent only for my own pleasure is evil and wealth earned and spent for the sake of dharma/others is divine.

·         Sattvic wealth, which is earned by virtuous means and spent for pleasure or for the peace and happiness of my eternal self and others.

·         Rajasic wealth, which is earned by selfish and aggressive means and spent for the egoistic purpose of enhancing my power and prestige or to promote my own interests and aims.

·         Tamasic wealth, which is earned by deception and cruelty and used for evil purposes to inflict pain and suffering upon others or to denounce God and spread chaos and confusion.

·         Goddess Lakshmi is goddess of wealth. Symbolically, she represents wealth in all its forms. She is a companion of Lord Vishnu.

·         Sri Lakshmi Narayana is the preserver and promoter of dharma. He is like the Householder of the creation, with all the wealth of the creation at his disposal (feet). Even though, he has no interest whatsoever, He upholds the creation as His obligatory duty (dharma) by ensuring their order and regularity.

·         The Bhagavad Gita contains knowledge of five eternal truths: God, the individual soul, the material world, action in this world, and time. Gita thoroughly explains the nature of my consciousness, the eternal self, and the universe. In a narrative style, the tale of the Bhagavad Gita is told through a dialogue between Arjuna, a warrior prince, and his charioteer, Krishna. Whilst Arjuna doubts whether he should go into battle, Krishna explains that he must fulfill his dharma (duty) on earth as a warrior.

·         May all I do be blessed with Divine Grace – Sri Lakshmi Narayana.

·         सत्य Satya 2024

·         सर्वं ज्ञानं मयि विद्यते All that I have to learn is within me 2024.

·         ब्रह्म सत्यम्, जगत् मिथ्या God Is Truth, The creation an Illusion 2024.

·         अहम् ब्रह्मास्मि I am God. I am Divine. 2024

·         तत् त्वम् असि You are God. You are divine 2024

·         स्वात्मानं प्रति सत्येन वर्ते I am true to my eternal self 2024.

·         सत्यमेवेश्वरो लोके सत्यं पद्माश्रिता सदा।सत्यमूलानि सर्वाणि सत्यान्नास्ति परं पदम्।।

·         Eternal Truth (Satya) is God – Sri Lakshmi Narayana. The goddess of wealth – Lakshmi always takes refuge in eternal truth. Truth is the root of everything 2024.

·         यो ददाति सहस्त्राणि गवामश्व शतानि च ।अभयं सर्वसत्वेभ्य स्तद्दानमिति चोच्यते ॥

·         One who gives fearlessness to all beings is called daan 2024

·         सरस्वति नमस्तुभ्यं वरदे कामरूपिणि

·         the capacity of Right Understanding, always 2024

·         नमस्ते शारदे देवी काश्मीरपुरवासिनित्वामहं प्रार्थये नित्यं विद्यादानं च देहि मे ॥

·         the gift of Knowledge which illumines everything from within 2024

·         उग्रं वीरं महाविष्णुं ज्वलन्तं सर्वतोमुखम् ।

·         नृसिंहं भीषणं भद्रं मृत्युमृत्युं नमाम्यहम् ॥ 2024

·         The Sudarshana Chakra is Sri Lakshmi Narayana’s divine weapon of eternal change. “Su” means auspicious, and “Dharshana” means vision. Sudharshana Chakra – “auspicious vision” or “divine vision”. 2024

·         सुदर्शन चक्र श्री लक्ष्मी नारायण का शाश्वत परिवर्तन का दिव्य शस्त्र है। “सु” का अर्थ है शुभ और “दर्शन” का अर्थ है दृष्टि। सुदर्शन चक्र – “शुभ दृष्टि” या “दिव्य दृष्टि”। २०२४

·         सुदर्शन चक्र हे श्री लक्ष्मी नारायणाचे शाश्वत परिवर्तनाचे दिव्य शस्त्र आहे. “सु” म्हणजे शुभ आणि “दर्शन” म्हणजे दृष्टी. सुदर्शन चक्र – “शुभ दृष्टी” किंवा “दैवी दृष्टी”. २०२४

·         I become what I believe – Bhagavad Gita 2024

·         I have the right to work, but never to the fruit of work. I should never engage in action for the sake of reward, nor should I long for inaction.” – The Bhagavad Gita 2024

·         Kalki (कल्कि) is the prophesied tenth and final incarnation of the Vishnu – the creator, sustainer and destroyer of infinite creations. 2024

·         By all the Vedas, I am to be known. Indeed, I am the compiler of Vedanta, and I am the knower of the Vedas. – Bhagavad Gita – 2024

·         Siddhi means “Sri Lakshmi Narayana” “eternal knowledge”, “eternal wisdom”, “eternal self”, “eternal truth” or “eternal supernatural powers.”

·         When Ganesha grants me Ashta Siddhis, I will create Mangalya, Shubh Labh, Fearlessness and Vaikuntha for all animate and inanimate creatures/objects on every grain of earth in a FRACTION OF A SECOND before 2024. It is just a matter of time before Ganesha blesses me with Ashta Siddhis to destroy Kaliyuga, adharma and asatya on every grain of earth.

·         The Eight types of Siddhis

·         Anima

·         With Anima Siddhi, I will be able to reduce my body to the size of an atom.

·         Mahima

·         With Mahima Siddhi, I will be able to expand my body to an infinitely large size.

·         Garima

·         With Mahima Siddhi, I will be able to increase my weight infinitely (sky).

·         Laghima

·         With Laghima Siddhi, I will be able to become weightless or lighter than air.

·         Prapti

·         With Prapti Siddhi, I will be able to reach/travel any place, anywhere in the creation IN A FRACTION OF A SECOND. I will be able to acquire or do anything I desire IN A FRACTION OF A SECOND; I will understand and speak the language of all animate creatures including animals and birds on earth. I will be able to control the infinite creations at will.

·         Prakamya

·         This Siddhi provides the energy to perform unique and incredible miracles. With its use, I will descend into the depths of the earth, access any place in the world, fly in the sky and survive under water as long as I desire.

·         Ishita

·         The seventh Siddhi is ‘Ishitva’ means supremacy over nature. I will be able to control Panch Tattva – Agni (Fire), Jal(Water), Vayu(Air), Pruthvi (Earth), Surya (Sun), Moon and Brahmand (Sky/Space/Universe/Infinite Creations).

·         Vasitva

·         With this Siddhi, I will be able to control everything in the creation.

·         Vishnu (विष्णु), is also known as Narayana and Hari. Whenever the world is threatened with ignorance, anger, greed, lust, domination, exploitation, fear, hunger, chaos, adharma, asatya, and destructive forces, Vishnu descends in the form of an avatar (incarnation) to restore the cosmic order and protect dharma. Vishnu is the preserver and protector of infinite creations.

·         Lakshmi, the goddess of wealth, fortune, and prosperity (both material and spiritual), is the wife and active energy of Vishnu. She is also called Sri. When Vishnu incarnates on Earth, Lakshmi incarnates as his consort.

·         As stated in the Bhagavad Gita, whenever evil gains ascendance on every grain of earth, God – Narayana incarnates on earth to restore dharma, punish the evil and protect the weak and the righteous. all incarnations of God are associated with Lord Vishnu because Vishnu is the preserver of infinite worlds, infinite creations and the purpose of an incarnation is also the same.

·         God – Narayana chooses different ways to restore order and balance in the universe. One is by the direct descent, with all his powers latent in human form and with all his attendant or associate divinities also joining him on the earthly plane to assist Him in His work. This is the incarnation proper (Purn Avatara) such as the incarnation of Rama or Krishna. He assumes this form only when an evil of gigantic dimensions rises its head and start fomenting trouble on every grain of infinite creations and infinite earths. Second, only an aspect (Amsa) of Him manifests on the earth in the form of a great soul for a specific purpose.

·         Kalki (कल्कि) is the prophesied tenth and final incarnation of the god Vishnu. He will descend on earth before 2024 to end the Kali Yuga on every grain of earth. Kalki will rejuvenate existence before 2024 by ending the darkest and destructive period on earth to remove asatya and adharma (unrighteousness) and ushering in the Satya Yuga.

·         1. I am NOT the divine son of God.

·         2. I am NOT a messenger of God.

·         3. I am NOT a prophet.

·         4. I am NOT a messiah.

·         5. I am NOT a Buddha.

·         6. I am NOT a Tirthankara.

·         7. I am NOT a Hindu.

·         8. I am NOT a Christian.

·         9. I am NOT a Muslim.

·         10. I am NOT a Jew.

·         11. I am NOT a Buddhist.

·         12. I am NOT a Jain.

·         13. I am NOT a Sikh.

·         14. I am NOT a Chinese, not a Russian. I DO NOT belong to any country. I am NOT an alien.

·         15. I DO NOT have a religion.

·         16. I am NOT a colonizer.

·         17. I am NOT an invader.

·         18. I am NOT a king, president, dictator, prime minister, or a politician.

·         19. I am NOT an Asian, European, North American, South American, Middle Eastern, Australian, or African.

·         20. I am NOT a Brahmin, Kshatriya, Shudra, or Vaishya.

·         21. I am NOT a Vaishnav or Shaivite.

·         22. I have NOT come from the Northern, Southern, Western or Eastern part of India. I have NOT come from any land of mother earth.

·         23. I am NOT an atheist.

·         24. I am NOT a missionary.

·         25. I AM Ganapati Bappa.

·         26. I AM Saraswati, Shakti, Lakshmi, Durga, and Kaali.

·         27. I AM Vishnu, Mahadev, and Brahma.

·         28. I AM Shiv, Bholenath, Mahakal, Kaalbhairava, and Rudra.

·         29. I AM Leela Purushottam Shree Krishna.

·         30. I AM Maryada Purushottam Shree Ram.

·         31. I AM Surya Putra Daanveer Karna.

·         32. I AM Pruthvi (Earth), Agni (Fire), Jal (Water), Vayu (Air), and Brahmand (Space).

·         33. I AM Surya (Sun) and the Moon.

·         34. I AM infinite creations.

·         35. I AM Satya, Dharma, Purushartha, Mangalya, Shubh Labh, and Fearlessness.

·         36. I AM pure thoughts, pure speech, pure actions, and pure mind.

·         37. I AM Bhagvad-Gita. I AM all the scriptures on infinite earths, infinite universes, and infinite creations. All scriptures lead to me; I am their author, thinking, imagination and wisdom.

·         38. I AM Vaikuntha.

·         39. I am Sri Lakshmi Narayana – The sustainer, destroyer, and creator of infinite creations.

·         40. I am Sri Lakshmi Narayana – Lakshmi’s devoted, loyal husband in this life, previous infinite lives, and infinite lives to come. I do not exist without my Lakshmi. My creation has no meaning without her.

·         41. I am Kalki – the tenth and final incarnation of Vishnu. I am going to destroy Kaliyuga, adharma and asatya IN A FRACTION OF A SECOND to establish Dharma and Satya on every grain of earth before 2024.

·         42. I am going to destroy everything IN A FRACTION OF A SECOND that comes in my way to create Vaikuntha on every grain of earth before 2024.

·         यदा यदा हि धर्मस्य ग्लानिर्भवति भारतअभ्युत्थानमधर्मस्य तदात्मानं सृजाम्यहम्परित्राणाय साधूनां विनाशाय च दुष्कृताम्धर्मसंस्थापनार्थाय सम्भवामि युगे युगे 2024

·         “Whenever there is decline of Dharma, and rise of Adharma, then I manifest Myself from age to age for the protection of pious, for the destruction of the wicked, and for the establishment of Dharma. 2024

·         जब जब धर्म को हानी होती है जब जब अधर्म में वृद्धि होती है तब तब सतपुरुषे के उद्धार के लिये अधर्मियो के विनाश के लिए और धर्म की पुन स्थापना के लिए मैं ही जन्म लेता हु 2024

·         कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन ।

·         मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भूर्मा ते सङ्गोऽस्त्वकर्मणि ॥ 2023

·         I have a right to perform my prescribed duties, but I am not entitled to the fruits of my actions. 2023

·         मुझे अपने निर्धारित कर्तव्यों का पालन करने का अधिकार है, लेकिन मैं अपने कर्मों के फल का अधिकारी नहीं हूं। 2023

·         वक्रतुण्ड महाकाय सूर्यकोटि समप्रभ ।

·         निर्विघ्नं कुरु मे देव सर्वकार्येषु सर्वदा ॥

·         Ganapati Bappa with elephant head, shining like infinite suns, remove all obstacles from my way, forever.

·         हाथी के सिर वाले गणपति बाप्पा, अनंत सूर्यों की तरह चमकते हुए, मेरे रास्ते से सभी बाधाओं को हमेशा के लिए दूर कर दो ।

·         सत्य Satya 2024

·         सत्य Satya 2024

·         The Sudarshana Chakra is Sri Lakshmi Narayana’s divine weapon of eternal change. “Su” means auspicious, and “Dharshana” means vision. Sudharshana Chakra – “auspicious vision” or “divine vision”. 2024

·         सुदर्शन चक्र श्री लक्ष्मी नारायण का शाश्वत परिवर्तन का दिव्य शस्त्र है। “सु” का अर्थ है शुभ और “दर्शन” का अर्थ है दृष्टि। सुदर्शन चक्र – “शुभ दृष्टि” या “दिव्य दृष्टि”। २०२४

·         सुदर्शन चक्र हे श्री लक्ष्मी नारायणाचे शाश्वत परिवर्तनाचे दिव्य शस्त्र आहे. “सु” म्हणजे शुभ आणि “दर्शन” म्हणजे दृष्टी. सुदर्शन चक्र – “शुभ दृष्टी” किंवा “दैवी दृष्टी”. २०२४

·         सत्य Satya 2024

·         सत्य Satya 2024

·         Science is a systematic endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.

·         Philosophy is the systematized study of general and fundamental questions, such as those concerning existence, reason, knowledge, values, mind, and language.

·         Psychology is the scientific study of mind and behavior in humans and non-humans. Psychology includes the study of conscious and unconscious phenomena, including feelings and thoughts. It is an academic discipline of immense scope, crossing the boundaries between the natural and social sciences. Psychologists seek an understanding of the emergent properties of brains, linking the discipline to neuroscience. As social scientists, psychologists aim to understand the behavior of individuals and groups.

·         A religion is a set of beliefs about the origin, nature, and purpose of existence, usually including a belief in supernatural entities, such as deitys or spirits that have power in the natural world. Religious practices include the rituals and devotions directed at the supernatural. Often religions believe in the spiritual nature of humans. There are many different religions, denominations or sects, each with a different set of beliefs. Some beliefs are also concerned with the moral behavior of humans. Each religion has different ideas about these things. Each religion also has a “moral code” which is a set of beliefs about how humans should act. Each religion usually has their own type of “devotions” when people worship or pray. Other words that are used for religion are “faith” and “belief system”

·         In many religions, one of the main beliefs is that there is a “deity” (or god) who is a great creator spirit. In many religions, there is just one deity that the people believe in. In other religions, there are many deities who each have different roles in the universe. In many religions, there are other types of spirits. These may include angels, devils and other such things which can be both good and bad.

·         Giving honour to God, the gods or the spirits is an important part of most religions. While this may often be done privately, it is also often done with gatherings of people and rituals. These rituals are often based on old traditions, and may have been done in almost the same way for hundreds, or even thousands of years.

·         Another main belief is that humans have a “soul” or spirit which lives on after their body has died. The person’s spirit is on a journey through life that continues after death. Most religions believe that what a person does during their lifetime will affect what happens to their spirit in the afterlife. Many religions teach that a good person’s spirit can reach a special place of peace and happiness such as Heaven or Nirvana, and that a bad person’s spirit can travel to a place of pain and suffering such as Hell. Still other religions believe in reincarnation – that instead of going either to Heaven or Hell, spirits of the dead return to earth in a new body.

·         “Morals” are the way a human behaves to other humans. Most religions make rules about human morals. The rules of how people should act to each other are different in different religions. A religion is passed on from one person to another through teachings and stories. In many religions, there are people who take the role of “priest” and spend their lives teaching others about the religion. There are also people who take the role of “pastor” and spend their life caring for other people. A person may be both a priest and a pastor. They are called by different names in different religions. Symbols are used to remind people of their religious beliefs. They are also used or worn as a sign to other people that the person belongs to a particular religion. A symbol might be something that is drawn or written, it might be a piece of clothing or jewellery, it might be a sign that a person makes with their body, or it might be a building or monument or artwork.

·         A religious denomination (also simply denomination) is a subgroup within a religion that has a common name, tradition, and identity. Religion is a range of social-cultural systems, including designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that generally relate humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements. The study of religion comprises a wide variety of academic disciplines, including theology, philosophy of religion, comparative religion, and social scientific studies.

·         Myth is a folklore genre consisting of narratives that play a fundamental role in a society, such as foundational tales or origin myths.

·         The main characters in myths are usually non-humans, such as gods, demigods, and other supernatural figures Others include humans, animals, or combinations in their classification of myth. Stories of everyday humans, although often of leaders of some type, are usually contained in legends, as opposed to myths. Myths are sometimes distinguished from legends in that myths deal with gods, usually have no historical basis, and are set in a world of the remote past, very different from that of the present

·         Myth, a story of the gods, a religious account of the beginning of the world, the creation, fundamental events, the exemplary deeds of the gods as a result of which the world, nature and culture were created together with all parts thereof and given their order, which still obtains. A myth expresses and confirms society’s religious values and norms, it provides a pattern of behavior to be imitated, testifies to the efficacy of ritual with its practical ends and establishes the sanctity of cult.

·         “mythology” usually refers to the collection of myths of a group of people

·         Myths are specific accounts of gods or superhuman beings involved in extraordinary events or circumstances in a time that is unspecified but which is understood as existing apart from ordinary human experience. The term mythology denotes both the study of myth and the body of myths belonging to a particular religious tradition.

·         As with all religious symbolism, there is no attempt to justify mythic narratives or even to render them plausible. Every myth presents itself as an authoritative, factual account, no matter how much the narrated events are at variance with natural law or ordinary experience.

·         Reason is the capacity of consciously applying logic by drawing conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth.[1][2] It is closely[how?] associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a distinguishing ability possessed by humans. Reason is sometimes referred to as rationality

·         Reasoning is associated with the acts of thinking and cognition, and involves the use of one’s intellect. The field of logic studies the ways in which humans can use formal reasoning to produce logically valid arguments.[5] Reasoning may be subdivided into forms of logical reasoning, such as deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning. Aristotle drew a distinction between logical discursive reasoning (reason proper), and intuitive reasoning,[6] in which the reasoning process through intuition—however valid—may tend toward the personal and the subjectively opaque. In some social and political settings logical and intuitive modes of reasoning may clash, while in other contexts intuition and formal reason are seen as complementary rather than adversarial. For example, in mathematics, intuition is often necessary for the creative processes involved with arriving at a formal proof, arguably the most difficult of formal reasoning tasks.

·         Reasoning, like habit or intuition, is one of the ways by which thinking moves from one idea to a related idea. For example, reasoning is the means by which rational individuals understand sensory information from their environments, or conceptualize abstract dichotomies such as cause and effect, truth and falsehood, or ideas regarding notions of good or evil. Reasoning, as a part of executive decision making, is also closely identified with the ability to self-consciously change, in terms of goals, beliefs, attitudes, traditions, and institutions, and therefore with the capacity for freedom and self-determinatio

·         a reason is a consideration given which either explains or justifies events, phenomena, or behavior. Reasons justify decisions, reasons support explanations of natural phenomena; reasons can be given to explain the actions (conduct) of individuals.

·         Logical reasoning is a form of thinking that is concerned with arriving at a conclusion in a rigorous manner.[1] This happens in the form of inferences by transforming the information present in a set of premises to reach a conclusion

·         Logical reasoning is a mental activity that aims to arrive at a conclusion in a rigorous manner. It happens in the form of inferences or arguments by starting from a set of premises and reasoning to a conclusion supported by these premises. The premises and the conclusion are propositions, i.e. true or false claims about what is the case. Together, they form an argument. Logical reasoning is norm-governed in the sense that it aims to formulate correct arguments that any rational person would find convincing. The main discipline studying logical reasoning is called logic.

·         Distinct types of logical reasoning differ from each other concerning the norms they employ and the certainty of the conclusion they arrive at.

·         For many classical philosophers, nature was understood teleologically, meaning that every type of thing had a definitive purpose that fit within a natural order that was itself understood to have aims. Perhaps starting with Pythagoras or Heraclitus, the cosmos is even said to have reason.[14] Reason, by this account, is not just one characteristic that humans happen to have, and that influences happiness amongst other characteristics. Reason was considered of higher stature than other characteristics of human nature, such as sociability, because it is something humans share with nature itself, linking an apparently immortal part of the human mind with the divine order of the cosmos itself. Within the human mind or soul (psyche), reason was described by Plato as being the natural monarch which should rule over the other parts, such as spiritedness (thumos) and the passions. Aristotle, Plato’s student, defined human beings as rational animals, emphasizing reason as a characteristic of human nature. He defined the highest human happiness or well being (eudaimonia) as a life which is lived consistently, excellently, and completely in accordance with reason.[15]

·         The conclusions to be drawn from the discussions of Aristotle and Plato on this matter are amongst the most debated in the history of philosophy.[16] But teleological accounts such as Aristotle’s were highly influential for those who attempt to explain reason in a way that is consistent with monotheism and the immortality and divinity of the human soul. For example, in the neoplatonist account of Plotinus, the cosmos has one soul, which is the seat of all reason, and the souls of all individual humans are part of this soul. Reason is for Plotinus both the provider of form to material things, and the light which brings individuals souls back into line with their source

·         The classical view of reason, like many important Neoplatonic and Stoic ideas, was readily adopted by the early Church as the Church Fathers saw Greek Philosophy as an indispensable instrument given to mankind so that we may understand revelation

·         The early modern era was marked by a number of significant changes in the understanding of reason, starting in Europe. One of the most important of these changes involved a change in the metaphysical understanding of human beings. Scientists and philosophers began to question the teleological understanding of the world. Nature was no longer assumed to be human-like, with its own aims or reason, and human nature was no longer assumed to work according to anything other than the same “laws of nature” which affect inanimate things. This new understanding eventually displaced the previous world view that derived from a spiritual understanding of the universe.

·         Accordingly, in the 17th century, René Descartes explicitly rejected the traditional notion of humans as “rational animals”, suggesting instead that they are nothing more than “thinking things” along the lines of other “things” in nature. Any grounds of knowledge outside that understanding was, therefore, subject to doubt. At this time I admit nothing that is not necessarily true. I am therefore precisely nothing but a thinking thing; that is a mind, or intellect, or understanding, or reason – words of whose meanings I was previously ignorant.

·         This eventually became known as epistemological or “subject-centred” reason, because it is based on the knowing subject, who perceives the rest of the world and itself as a set of objects to be studied, and successfully mastered by applying the knowledge accumulated through such study. Breaking with tradition and many thinkers after him, Descartes explicitly did not divide the incorporeal soul into parts, such as reason and intellect, describing them as one indivisible incorporeal entity.

·         Reason and imagination rely on similar mental processes. A subdivision of philosophy is logic. Logic is the study of reasoning. Looking at logical categorizations of different types of reasoning, the traditional main division made in philosophy is between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning. Formal logic has been described as the science of deduction.[69] The study of inductive reasoning is generally carried out within the field known as informal logic or critical thinking.

·         Traditionally, faith, in addition to reason, has been considered a source of religious beliefs. The interplay between faith and reason, and their use as perceived support for religious beliefs, have been a subject of interest to philosophers and theologians.[8] The origin of religious belief as such is an open question, with possible explanations including awareness of individual death, a sense of community, and dreams.

·         Truth is the property of being in accord with fact or reality. In everyday language, truth is typically ascribed to things that aim to represent reality.

·         Truth is usually held to be the opposite of falsehood. The concept of truth is discussed and debated in various contexts, including philosophy, art, theology, and science. Most human activities depend upon the concept, where its nature as a concept is assumed rather than being a subject of discussion; these include most of the sciences, law, journalism, and everyday life. Some philosophers view the concept of truth as basic, and unable to be explained in any terms that are more easily understood than the concept of truth itself. Most commonly, truth is viewed as the correspondence of language or thought to a mind-independent world.

·         निंदा से घबराकर मुझे अपने लक्ष को नहीं छोड़ना चाहिए, जब मैं मेरे लक्ष को प्राप्त करता हु तब निंदा करने वालो की राय एक क्षण में बदल जाती है – २०२४

·         I must not give up on my eternal goals on earth due to fear of condemnation and criticism, the opinion of detractors will change in a fraction of a second when I achieve my goals before 2024.

·         सत्य Satya 2024

• जगज्जाल पालम् कचत् कण्ठमालं शरच्चन्द्र भालं महादैत्य कालम्। नभो-नीलकायम् दुरावारमायम् सुपद्मा सहायं भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।1।

• सदाम्भोधिवासं गलत्पुष्हासं जगत्सन्निवासं शतादित्यभासम्। गदाचक्रशस्त्रं लसत्पीत-वस्त्रं हसच्चारु-वक्रं भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।2।

• रमाकण्ठहारं श्रुतिवातसारं जलान्तर्विहारं धराभारहारम्। चिदानन्दरूपं मनोज्ञस्वरूपं धृतानेकरूपं भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।3।

• जराजन्महीनम् परानन्द पीनम् समाधान लीनं सदैवानवीनम्। जगज्जन्म हेतुं सुरानीककेतुम् त्रिलोकैकसेतुं भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।4।

• कृताम्नाय गानम् खगाधीशयानं विमुक्तेर्निदानं हरारातिमानम्। स्वभक्तानुकूलम् जगद्दृक्षमूलम् निरस्तार्तशूलम् भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।5।

• समस्तामरेशम् द्विरेफाभ केशं जगद्विम्बलेशम् हृदाकाशदेशम्। सदा दिव्यदेहं विमुक्ताखिलेहम् सुवैकुन्ठगेहं भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।6।

• सुराली-बलिष्ठं त्रिलोकीवरिष्ठं गुरूणां गरिष्ठं स्वरूपैकनिष्ठम्। सदा युद्धधीरं महावीर वीरम् महाम्भोधि तीरम् भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।7।

• रमावामभागम् तलनग्ननागम् कृताधीनयागम् गतारागरागम्। मुनीन्द्रैः सुगीतं सुरैः संपरीतं गुणौगैरतीतं भजेऽहं भजेऽहं।8।

• I worship and worship him,

• Who is the protector of the world,

• Who wears shining garland on his neck,

• Who has a forehead like autumn moon,

• Who is the god of death to great asuras,

• Who has the blue colour of the sky,

• Who has unstoppable powers of illusion,

• And who is the helper to Goddess Lakshmi.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who always lives in the sea,

• Who has a smile like a flower,

• Who lives everywhere in the world,

• Who has the sparkle of hundred suns,

• Who has mace and holy wheel as armaments,

• Who wears yellow cloths,

• And who has a sweet face adorned with smile.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who is the garland in the neck of Lakshmi,

• Who is the essence of Vedas, Who lives inside water,

• Who lightens the weight of earth,

• Who has a form which is eternally pleasing,

• Who has a form which attracts the mind,

• And who has assumed several forms.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who does not have birth or aging,

• Who is full of eternal happiness,

• Who is always interested in peace,

• Who does not have anything new,

• Who is the cause of birth of this world,

• Who is the protector of the deva army,

• And who is the bridge between the three worlds.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who is the singer of the Vedas,

• Who rides on the king of birds,

• Who is the cause of salvation,

• Who kills enemies of Lord Shiva,

• Who is very partial to his devotees,

• Who is the root of the three of the world,

• And is the exterminator of all sorrows.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who is the lord of all devas,

• Who has a pretty hair frequented by bees,

• Who has this earth as a part of him,

• Who has a body as clear as the sky,

• Who always has a holy mien,

• Who has no attachments to this world,

• And has Vaikunta as his home.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who is the strongest among devas,

• Who is the greatest among the three worlds,

• Who is the heaviest among heavy people,

• Who is always heroic in battles,

• Who is the great hero of heroes,

• And takes you across the sea of life.

• I worship and worship him,

• Who keeps Lakshmi on his left side,

• Who can be approached by Yagas,

• Who is not interested in anything,

• Who carried the Govardhana Mountain,

• Who is pure music to great sages,

• Who is served by Devas,

• And who is above all beings.